False Reference of Hadith by False Ahle Hadith Ghair Muqallid

Confession of a Ghair Muqallid

This is taken from the book where some of the other blogs have come from.

This is the final question and answer that took place between the Ghair Muqallid and the Hanafi.
(Green is the Ghair Muqallid) Actually (what had happened was,) I was working with a few Ghair muqalliDeen youngsters. These youngsters gave me a few books. I had no knowledge of what was written in these books. After having read these books I began lifting my hands (at various points in sasalah), I began to stand (in salah) with my legs spread apart, I began to place my hands on my chest (in salah) etc. You have answered all my questions with proofs and have explained things very well to me. Now I am at ease. What remains, is that I
have been affected by a few books. Could you perhaps do something about that?
Which books have they given you? Could you show them to me?
“Salatur Rasool” and “Sabeelur Rasool” both by, Hakeem Sawdiq Siyaalkoti and “Haqeeqatul-fiqh” by Yusu Jaipoori.
Brother! These are the very three books which the Ghair muqalliDeen give to people in an attempt to deviate them. They move people away from following Imam Sahib (R.A), and make them follow an ignorant Siyaalkoti. What a fraud! They create a dislike towards taqleed, and put a person back onto taqleed of some modern day preacher (in another form). 

Is there anything wrong with the content of those books? 
Is it possible to be a Ghair muqallid and not speak lies? Let us take a close look at 
some of Hakeem Sawdiq Sahibs lies. Here is the book, Salatur rasool; 
1) On pg.131 he writes the azaan and gives reference of Bukhari and Muslim, whereas this is not a narration of Bukhari. This is an accusation against Imam Bukhai (R.A) 
2) On pg.161 he states that the hands should be raised up to the shoulders or the ears and gives reference of Bukhari and Muslim, whereas these words are not found in Bukhari. 
3) He has mentioned a Hadith on pg.179 under the chapter regarding masnoon Qiraat and has given the reference of Muwatta Imam Malik. This is also a lie. 
4) He has written the azaan mentioning Allaahu Akbar four times, on pg.135 and 
gives reference of Muslim, whereas this too is a lie. 
5) He mentions the words ‘laa yastadir’ on pg.134 and gives the reference of Bukhari and Muslim, whereas this belies both books. 
The lies found in Sabeelur rasool; 
1) He narrates a Hadith thus, ‘the best of deeds is the perfoming of salah in its initial time’ and gives reference of Bukhari. This is an open lie. 
2) He mentions a narration regarding three talaaq (divorce) and gives the reference of Bukhari, whereas this is not in Bukhari. 
3) In a similar manner he has added the words, all of a sudden, in the translation of the Hadith regarding three talaaqs, which is either a black or white lie. 
4) He gives reference to Ibn Majah and Muwatta Imam Malik when mentioning the 
incident that occurred at the time of Fajr regarding the recital of surah Fatiha 
behind the Imam. This is a false claim, as this Hadith is not mentioned in both 
these books. 
Now you tell me, when Sawdiq, “truthful” speaks so much lies, what will the condition of the rest be? The lies mentioned in the book, ‘Haqeeqatul-fiqh’ are countless. 

Nevertheless, I will make mention of a few so that the importance of this book becomes known to you.
1) The Hadith which tells us to tie the hands below the navel is a weak Hadith. He 
gives the reference of Hidaayah for this. 
2) The Hadith which tells us to tie the hands on the chest is an authentic Hadith. He 
gives the reference of Hidaayah for this. 
3) To read “allaahumma baa’id baini” is more correct than reading 
“subhanakAllaahuma” (as thanaa in the beginning of salah.) He gives the 
reference of Sharhe- Wiqayah for this. 
4) The Hadith which mentions not to read surah Faatiha behind the Imam is a weak 
Hadith. He gives reference of Sharhe-Wiqayah for this. 
5) The Hadith “izaa kabbaral Imamu fa kabbiroo bi he” is a weak Hadith. He gives 
reference of Sharhe-Wiqayah for this. 
6) The saying of ameen is a stamp of acceptance. He gives reference of Sharhe- 
Wiqayah for this. 
7) The muqtadi should say ameen upon hearing the Imam’s ameen. He gives 
reference of Durre Mukhtar for this. 
8) The Hadith (in which we are told to make) raful yadain as compared to the one 
(which tells us) not to make, is stronger. He gives reference of Hidaayah for this. 
9) All the Ahadith which mention not to make raful yadain are weak. He gives 
reference of Sharhe-Wiqyah for this. 
10) To dispute/wrangle with the person who makes raful yadain is permissible. He 
gives reference of Hidaayah for this. 
All this is pure lies. The original text of the book should be presented. The Ghair 
muqalliDeen scholars will never ever present the original text. 
These are the three books which have had an effect on you without any reason, my brother. The result of this conversation 
I will never lay my hands on such books which have so many lies in them. I seek refuge from (joining) such a sect in the future, which speak so many lies. You have put me at ease as far as every matter of mine. The truth of the matter is that we (only) learn a few Ahadith, and then fall behind (attacking) those who have (actually) dedicated their lives for the course of Deen. We have no knowledge whatsoever as far as which (Hadith) is abrogated, and which (Hadith) has replaced it. We should be praying for those who have sacrificed their lives in the preservation and presentation of all the rulings of Deen for us. At the times of difficult we go to them for the solution, and (at other times) we swear at them, this is sheer treachery. I am going to re-invite all those whom I have encouraged to read salah bare-headed, and make salaam with one hand. I am also going
to bring back those whom I have made to stand with their feet spread apart in salah. The very first lesson of those friends who had put me on this (path of Ghair muqalliDeen) was, not to go and question those who have knowledge regarding the Ghair muqalliDeen, but to go to the uneducated and those who have made no research, and pester them. I have joined forces with them and ridiculed my father on numerous occasions. I will seek forgiveness from him too. Today only have I realized how these people speak lies using the name of the Quraan and Hadith. They call everything Hadith. What will the condition of the general masses amongst them be, when the ulama amongst them speak so many lies? May Allaah protect every Muslim from speaking lies and may He guide one and all to follow in the footsteps of the pious predesessors. Ameen. 

reference: 
A Gift to the Ahle-Hadith 
{By Abu Bilaal Jhangawi} 
Translation Edited by: Mufti A H Elias (May Allaah protect him) 
Shawaal 2029 – October 2008

Muhammedi or Hanafi the Ghair Muqallid false salafi Ahle hadith confusion

Question by the Ghair Muqallid :

“Tell me, why are you called Hanafi and not Muhammedi? So, are you a Hanafi or a Muhammedi?

Answer by the Hanafi:

“Today you have mimicked the wahaabis and said good-bye to your brain!

Question by the Ghair Muqallid:

“How is that?”

Answer by the Hanafi :

“Your question is like my asking you whether it is Saturday or January; or is it Wednesday or February? Any intelligent person would be astounded, for if there were any conflict (in meaning) between January and Saturday, only then would this question be sensible.

When today can be the Saturday and also be January then there is no difference between the two. Rather, the question should be, is today Saturday or Sunday? Is it the month of January or that of February? A day will oppose another day, and a month would oppose another month.

I can also ask you questions like yours. Are you a ghair muqallid or a human? Are you an AhleHadith or a human? Are you Pakistani or Panjaabi? Just as these questions are incorrect in your opinion, the question of being a Muhammedi orHanafi is incorrect.

Should your question be correct, would you kindly answer the above three questions of mine? The answer to such questions would just be swearing.

Now listen, if someone asks as to why you are referred to as Panjaabi or Laahori and not Pakistani, you would say we are referred to as Pakistanis when compared to those living in countries outside Pakistan and as Panjaabis when compared to those living in Sindh or Baluchistan. In the same way when a non-Muslim asks who you are, you would say youre a Muslim and Muhammedi. This means that the words Muslim and Muhammedi are used when compared to non-Muslims, and Hanafi is used when compared with Shafis, Maalikis, etc.

You do accept that being called a Panjaabi does not negate being a Pakistani, nor does being an Ahle Hadith negate being a human, why would being a Hanafi negate being a Muhammedi?”

Question by the Ghair Muqallid:

“Should we accept that which the Nabi (S.A.W) says, or that which an Ummati says?”

Answer by the Hanafi:

“When that which the Ummati says is contrary to that which theNabi says, then, only that which the Nabi says would be accepted.

When that which the Ummati says does not contradict what theNabi says, 

The explanation of this has been given by Shah Waliullah (R.A) in the following words;

We do not follow the Imams except for the fact that they are more knowledgeable than us as regards the book of Allaah and the teachings of His Rasul. (Hujjatullahil-baaligah)

The munkireen-e-Hadith also ask if one should accept that which the Creator says or that which the creation says? The person answering will definitely say that one should accept that which the Creator says. As soon as he says this, the munkir-e-Hadith will say, Bukhari, Muslim, Abu-Dawud, Tirmizi, ibn-Majah, Nasai are all the works of the slave and the only book of the master is the Quraan, one has to accept it only and practice on it, not on the books of the slaves.

My brother, you have now adopted the way and manner of the munkireen-e- Hadith. They confused matters by saying Creator and creation and made the people discard the Hadith of Rasulullaah (S.A.W). You are confusing matters by sayingNabi and Ummati in an effort to make people discard the Fiqh of the fuqaha. This is also a question you have stolen from them. You call yourself Ahle Hadith and they call themselves Ahle Quraan.”

Question by the Ghair Muqallid :

“One should follow only and only Nabi (S.A.W), not an Ummati, whereas you accept the Fiqh of Imam Abu Hanifa (R.A).”

Answer by the Hanafi :

“We follow and obey only Nabi (S.A.W), but not by our own understanding but the understanding of salafus salehin codified by Imam A’zam Abu Hanifa (R.A)”